The liberal Democrats are in the position of that Geneva war Correspondent for a New York newspaper, Vladimir Illyich Lenin and the other war Correspondent and Manhattan, NY émigré, Leon Trotsky, during WW1. The real objective for Lenin, Trotsky and the Bolsheviks was not military victory over the Kaiser but the overthrow of the Russian democratic government presided over by Kerensky.  The Bolsheviks, the "only one party is necessary" socialist of their times were more interested in consolidating power than winning a war.  They abdicated any support for their army or victory over the Kaiser to set up a policy  to overthrow their republic  and taking total control of their congress, the Duma.  Therefore the Bolsheviks signed the Brest- Litovsk Treaty , preferring surrender to the Germans in order to consolidate power at home.

     In a similar manner the Democrats were willing and able to sell military secrets and technology to communist China for campaign contributions.  Nancy Pelosi tried to incite the Turks to attack American troops, with her ludicrous reference to the Armenian genocide and her support of the Marxist PKK.  Of course Senators Reid, Durbin and Kennedy have shown their disdain for American troops and their solidarity with the Muslim extremist in the same way they aided, supported and abetted the North Vietnamese communist so many years ago.

    Like the Bolsheviks, the Democrats consider themselves Plato's enlightened Philosopher Kings. They call themselves” Vanguards of the Revolution”, those who are so pure and enlightened that they must for a time rule the unenlightened proletariat and exterminate the reactionary bourgeoisie. ( In this case the bourgeois kulaks are the Conservative, Christian, Constitutionalist or Capitalist Caucasian male). Their progressive priority, as shown by Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton and the rest of the neo-Jacobin, Saul Alinsky disciples is one-party control.  This is why they seem more allied with the mullahs of Islam. liberals and the radical Muslims seem to have a mutual hatred for Christianity, free enterprise Capitalism, our Constitution and conservative principles.   The Democrats and the radical Mullahs both are colluding, conniving and plotting to overthrow George Bush, the Republican Party and any conservative elements in America, like the armed forces.  The Liberals will not be satisfied until the non-elected fellow socialist of the UN and their brutal troops acts as the Varangian or Praetorian guard of the Progressive elitist. (This explains their hatred of our Second amendment rights as well.)  This is the goal of the Socialist INTERNATIONALE of which the Democratic Party and their fellow elitist in the media, academia and politics are only a part.

 Mike Guy

There are three types of Communist/ Socialist and two types of Muslim Terrorist regimes in the world as defined by our politicians in  Washington.
   There are the usual fellow travelers, the progressive socialist regimes throughout the third world that are lauded and supported by progressive Democrats.  Liberal chic demands solidarity with African or South American dictators, no mater how repressive or brutal.  Joe Kennedy's affiliation with the communist dictator Hugo Chavez of  is a recent example. The politically correct, Orwellian "Ministry of Truth" demands solidarity and support of every insurgency, militia or established political organization be named "freedom "or "voices of the people".
  Then there is the Republican endorsed Communist in Beijing.  The Republicans seem to have exonerated and excused any and all atrocities committed  by the  People's Republic of China.  It doesn't matter if the Communist regime of  China orders their own students crushed by tanks in Tianemen Square or the Chinese soldiers and secret police agents are incarcerating and imprisoning innocent protesters in Tibet.  Lets face it, China invaded, conquered and  practically enslaved a free and sovereign nation , in exactly the same way as Stalin  conquered and crushed  the nations of Eurasia.  But commercial interest, the Free Trade policy of our Republican plutocrats  and the fact that our national debt is subsidized by China will intimidate the Republicans into acquiescence.   All that rhetoric about freedom, democracy and rights goes right out the window. The Chinese Communist are encouraged to retain their totalitarian control just like the royal, non-elected,  princes who rule Saudi Arabia. 
  It is ironic that Rep. Nancy Pelosi can support the Kurdish Marxist separatist, the PKK, and offend our ally, Turkey.  But give her credit and kudos for her courage to confront the brutal repression of the Communist Chinese and their attempts to crush and control Tibet.  It will be Tibet today, Taiwan tomorrow and then Japan, Korea and the Philippines in the future.
And then there is Cuba our whipping boy. Every politician that wants to put on a pretense of standing up against Marxist or totalitarian regimes will stand tough against the Castro Brothers and keep our embargo.
  In like manner, we have Syrian-Iranian backed  Shia Islamic terrorist that don't seem to bother the Democrats, as long as they embarrass the Bush agenda in Iraq.  Just as many Democrats in the 60's professed solidarity with the North Vietnamese, today's progressives have a solidarity with the Ba'ath Socialst and the Iranian-supported terrorist.  In like manner, the Republican Party refers to the Saudi princes as our "ally".  This despite the overwhelming evidence that the 911 terrorist, including Osama Bin Ladin, were financed by the non-elected, aristocratic Saudi Royal Family.  The  Republican Party's ally, Saudi Arabia, is the perpetrators and supporter of the Sunni Wahabi Madras school systems.  These Madrases indoctrinate student throughout the world to hate America, Capitalism, Our Constitution and Christianity with a violent vehemence that is far greater than even the Reverend Wright or the ACLU.
Michael Guy

Why do the "For Sale or Rent" Representatives in the Versailles Congress continue with this maddening devotion to Adam Smith and Free Trade policies, like the Columbian Free Trade Agreement?.  A drive along any major river, replete with abandoned factories, should be evidence that Free Trade is a failed policy, from a utilitarian point of view.  But, Free Trade a boon to the international plutocracy that rule like robber barons and use factories as fiefs.  Free Trade is an insidious, if not treacherous, policy that claims to give the citizens access to foreign made goods at cheaper prices.  It is the same economic policy of the Confederate States of America.  We use brown-skinned cheap labor for the large, agri-business plantations and allow our factories to languish.  Yes, free trade does allow for cheaper goods, but at what expense?  If we returned to the wise policy of Alexander Hamilton and imposed tariffs, we would first of all find a better way to feed the ever-gluttonous "Leviathan", the government. The added cost of goods in an economy relying on tariffs would be offset by a decrease in the amount of personal and corporate taxation that our bloated bureaucracies extort.  The liberals are also to be faulted for the ills of a free trade policy.  Progressive Democrats are continuously trying to impose the rules, regulations and restrictions.   Liberals issue thousands of counter-productive mandates through the hundreds of bureaus and departments that infest our land.  The imposition of environmental restrictions, and labor regulations, and the mandated cost of maintaining an employee are too burdensome on domestic industries that must compete against third-world, "most favored nation" trading partners, like China.  Our competitors have no effective environmental or workers' rights policies imposed upon their foreign factories.  Washington can not foist all these environmental and social welfare restrictions on domestic business and tell them to compete against foreign industries. The Third World factories, owned wholly in part by Western financiers, are reminiscent of the early Industrial Revolution times of Charles Dickens or Upton Sinclair.  If the Democrats insist on such restrictions, (or from a Democrat's point of view; protections), then they must insist on Hamiltonian protections for imports.  The Democrats have fettered our factories and businesses with fines, diktats, regulations and restrictions.  Meanwhile, the "let them eat cake" Republicans force American businesses to compete with companies that not only have low wages, but no health care, social security, compensation and other cost.  I can only conclude this is done to benefit Americans who have become business partners with Communist China and are part owners of the foreign factories that put Americans out of work.  In addition, it seems clear that the Bush Administration and the RNC wish to complete Aaron Burr’s goal of a united North America, ruled by an elite aristocracy from their haciendas.   Perhaps this also explains Congress’ refusal to protect our borders, since their plans for our future is an amalgamation of the people from Canada to Columbia into one unified region ruled by Chinese, Castilian and American elites.  It is the international plutocracy, (including the wealthy American who control both parties), that invest in the third world to sell in the First world. These wealthy factory owners and financiers will become feudal lords imposing a negative balance of trade. It seems as if both liberal and “Free Trade” conservatives seem intent on re-instating the old English system of Mercantilism, in which the Empire’s government grants charters of monopoly to favored business to the detriment of the free enterprise liberty of the domestic common citizen.  If you think it is bad now, what till the aristocracy start rationing and restricting carbon usage in America.  The Carbon credit monopoly scheme will conveniently and lucratively, allow China, and the third world factories to have unrestricted and unregulated usage of all the coal and oil their factories can consume.  Under the ruse of a fabricated environmental catastrophe, there will be additional loss of American manufacture, job loss and wage reductions as American citizens compete for scarce economic resources with the aliens the Republican and Democratic leadership welcomed into our country.  This is the agenda of Senators Obama, Clinton and John McCain.  Hey brother can you spare a dime?  Better learn to say that in Spanish

Mike Guy

    In James Michener’s novel, Poland, there is a story of how the feudal lords made it a capital offense for a peasant to grind their own grain with a private millstone to make bread.  Today’s would be aristocrats are trying to institute a new lucrative measure of control and rationing; carbon credits. In this new scheme certain well connected bureaucrats and politicians will determine and ration how much coal, wood or petroleum products they will allow a person, business and even country to use. Under the ruse and guise of “protecting the planet” they will be the sole, non-elected arbiters on how much carbon one can use for travel, heating and industry.  In short, they will control all industrial processes along with modes and amount of travel. First, they will paraphrase Henny Penny’s portentous, despairing cry of imminent doom, “The sky is heating!”  Then, the only solution proffered will be absolute control of all combustion.  Finally, only friends, contributors and companies in which they or their collaborators own stock will be allowed access  to resources needed for industry and the economy. This resembles the government-chartered monopolies in the age of Mercantilism.  In fact it will be a type of Marxist monopoly envisioned in Ayn Rand’s novel, Atlas Shrugged.  And who stands to benefit for this feudal right to allocate resources and sell the permission to use carbon? It will be their new excellencies, Al Gore, Robert Kennedy, John Edwards, Barak Obama and the rest of the Democratic progressive elite.

 

P.S Carbon Dioxide is only 1/3 of one percent, that is 0.0034 of the pressure, volume and mass of the air. 79% is Nitrogen almost 21% oxygen. All other gases< 1%.  I doubt it makes much difference compared to solar activity.  Another idea to consider, wouldn't you think the northern states like Michigan and Washington, as well as Canada and Russia would benefit with a longer growing seasons, perhaps more rainfall and lower heating cost?  Perhaps a longer growing season in the grain regions of the world, more rainfall, lower heating cost would benefit humanity?  It benefited Lief Erikson, Greenland and Europe in the 1300's.

Michael Guy